On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:09:47PM +0100, Mark de Wever wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Iurii Chernyi wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Here at FOSDEM we were again talked about moving away from gna > > bugracker and gna-hosted svn to our own bugtracker and github-hosted > > git. > > Since there have been no objections to move to git I'll contact GitHub > and ask them whether our repository size is an issue.
I had contact with the supportdesk of GitHub and they really want to keep repositories at maximum size of 1 GB. I had a look at some other hosting parties: - gitorious, has a bandwidth limit of 500 MB/month [1], so I think that's not an option. - SourceForge, has no limits [2], we should probably contact them before uploading the repository there. I know SourceForge also has a Trac based bugtracker, this tracker looks a lot like redmine (or the other way around). This is a tracker boucman likes. Our release binaries are hosted at SourceForge, so we already use some of their services. Esr is looking at splitting of the resources and website branch of our repository; there are branches not used for main development. It is not expected that this excercise reduces the repository below the 1 GB marker. So I see two options: - Split our repository in several parts to get below the 1 GB limit. The size should be small enough to not hit the 1 GB limit within the near future. - Look at moving to SourceForge. I prefer to keep our repository in one piece* so I'd rather look at moving to SourceForge. *) I don't mind to split resources and website branch. [1] http://en.gitorious.org/tos/ [2] http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Disk%20quotas -- Regards, Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
