"Jens Rösner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Hrvoje! > >> > retrieval, eventhough the cookie is there. I think that is a >> > correct behaviour for a secure server, isn't it? >> Why would it be correct? > Sorry, I seem to have been misled by my own (limited) experience: >>From the few secure sites I use, most will not let you > log in again after you closed and restarted your browser
That merely means that the cookie is marked non-permanent -- which is probably the case here as well. A site that banned reconnecting would effectively ban all HTTP/1.0 browsers, which would probably be going too far.