On 10/11/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hash: SHA256
> Tony Godshall wrote:
> > On 10/10/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> My current impression is that this is a useful addition for some limited
> >> scenarios, but not particularly more useful than --limit-rate already
> >> is. That's part of what makes it a good candidate as a plugin.
> >
> > I guess I don't see how picking a reasonable rate automatically is
> > less useful then having to know what the maximum upstream bandwidth is
> > ahead of time.
> I never claimed it was less useful. In fact, I said it was more useful.
> My doubt is as to whether it is _significantly_ more useful.

For me, yes.  For you, apparently not.  It's a small patch, really.
Did you even look at it?

> I'm still open, just need more convincing.

Well, I've said my piece.

Anyone want to comment on the actual code?

Anybody try it?

Reply via email to