On 10/11/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Tony Godshall wrote: > > On 10/10/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My current impression is that this is a useful addition for some limited > >> scenarios, but not particularly more useful than --limit-rate already > >> is. That's part of what makes it a good candidate as a plugin. > > > > I guess I don't see how picking a reasonable rate automatically is > > less useful then having to know what the maximum upstream bandwidth is > > ahead of time. > > I never claimed it was less useful. In fact, I said it was more useful. > My doubt is as to whether it is _significantly_ more useful.
For me, yes. For you, apparently not. It's a small patch, really. Did you even look at it? > I'm still open, just need more convincing. Well, I've said my piece. Anyone want to comment on the actual code? Anybody try it?
