On Sep 4, 2005, at 22:23, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Sep 4, 2005, at 19:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Quoting Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What about the interaction of <section> with <head> and <body>?
You said yourself that any element other than a few known ones closes
the HEAD
element and implies a BODY element start tag.
So I did, but I now think my reasoning leading to that conclusion was
flawed. (I should have corrected myself on this mailing list earlier.)
If only a closed list of elements is allowed in HEAD, it will be
impossible to introduce extensions that occur as children of HEAD. An
explicit list of element starts that close HEAD would solve that
problem.
The implicit boundary of HEAD and BODY is a tricky issue with
open-ended extensions. I guess I'll have to examine browser behavior
as the next step.
It appears that my first attempt was compatible with browsers and
introducing new child elements of HEAD is already impossible.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/