Anne van Kesteren wrote: > So WHATWG doesn't really care about DTDs. (There are two people > involved with that though for validating.) This is important issue, because requirement to keep DTD accurate imposes certain constraints on markup (for example DTD fails to catch errors like <a href="#top"><span><a href="#bottom">link</a></span></a>) therefore it is better to know in advance whether normative DTD is required or not (Relax NG could be more suitable as it admits more accurate content models then DTD).
> What's needed for a specification is error handling, how it interoperates > with existing > HTML, etc. All efforts will be made to keep markup clean and consistent, to avoid conflicts between presentational HTML elements and math oriented elements and to specify allowed nesting of elements properly. -- _______________________________________________ Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way: Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com Powered by Outblaze