Also sprach James Graham:
> > I think you make a compelling case for adding math to HTML the simple
> > way. Personally, I'm open to adding it to HTML5. How much would it add
> > to the specification?
>
> I remain sceptical about this. However, if there is a serious effort to
> replace
> MathML I believe the resulting language must fulfil the following
> requirements:
The goal is not to replace MathML. At this point there isn't much to
replace -- MathML isn't found in HTML in the wild. Aslo, at the spec
level, I believe the two can co-exist just like WebForms and XForms
can co-exist.
I agree with your other points, though -- nice list.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.opera.com/howcome
