On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:03:33 +0100, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The fact is that authors already try things like <div/>, <p/> and even
<a/>. I've seen all of those examples in the wild. See, for instance,
the source of the XML 1.0 spec (and many others) which claim to be
XHTML as text/html, littered with plenty of <a/> tags all throughout.
...
Huh? The thing at <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>? Don't see that
problem there.
<h5><a name="IDANQDS" id="IDANQDS" />Names and Tokens</h5>
is one example...
If this was the case at an earlier point of time, it was probably caused
by a bug in their XSLT code, not the authors writing the spec (which
IMHO uses the W3C's xmlspec XML language).
In your humble opinion or is it just a fact? :-)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
