From: +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okey with this.' -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational justification for my feelings.' ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!' -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.' +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the skills necessary to help out.'
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto On 12/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wtf is a 0.5 vote? can i vote 0.7 for and 0.3 against? my brain cant do floating point math! /me kicks martijn in the ball -igor On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A lot of people have asked in the past for a component interface and > we said no (until OSGi came with a good reason, and even then). Just > only asking for opening up is not a good reason to do so IMO. > > A good reason I can come up with for removing final from the > onComponentTag method is to reduce the need for AttributeModifiers. > These use up memory just as components, and therefore can increase > memory load. I have done so in a couple of places in our application, > reducing the memory footprint considerably. However, these were done > on Panels and WebMarkupContainers, which already don't have a final on > onComponentTag. > > My point here is: removing final from onComponentTag may give better > scalability, and in some cases even be more convenient (if you already > are subclassing the component). > > I have yet to encounter a case for removing final from onComponentBody > on all (or any for that matter) components. In my opinion removing > final from onCB gives too much opportunity for servlet style > programming. > > [-0.5] yes, make all onComponentTag and onComponentTagBody methods of > the standard components in core non-final. This does leave the door > open for specific components to not adhere to that - I'm not proposing > a new standard - but if this wins we would remove final for most of em > > [0.5] no, leave the code as it is now > > Martijn > > -- > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket > ">Wicket</a> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in > the World!</a> >
-- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
