[Wicket-develop] =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5BWicket-develop=5D_Re=3A_=5BWicket-?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?develop=5D_Re=3A_=5BWicket-develop=5D_Re=3A_=5BWi?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?cket-_develop=5D_Re=3A_=5BWicket-develop=5D_Re=3A?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=5BWi_cket-_develop=5D_Issue_with_special_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?characters_=28=E4_=F6=FC=DF_etc=2E=29?=

[Johan Compagner]

I have had projects where we needed to send out all pages in UTF-8
The database was in UTF-8 and all the way through to the client was done 
in UTF-8
Is this still possible then?

johan
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Yes, it could be private. My thoughts were: as Eelco has mentioned the
default mapping provided by CharSetMap are probably good for 95% of
all cases. To mkae it protected means that subclasses of Page are able
to modifiy that mapping for the remaining 5%. On the other hand,
CharSetMap provides plenty of means to externally configure the map.
Thus no need for a subclass to do it. Yes, you right:  private is
probably better.
Juergen
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop