All,
I've just played with the dojo support and found it working pretty
good, *but* ... I had immediately the need to use an other
version of the dojo.js file.
Now this left me thinking that the libraries of dojo and scriptaculous
will probably have shorter cycles than the wicket core. I therefore
propose to
move these two packages with Ajax specific handlers (and later
components) into their own libaries and give them their own release
cycles.
Giving these two packages their own project will allow quick turn arounds and specific components developed for each library.
Note that the generic Ajax handler and support remain in Wicket core. Just the specific library support will be extracted.
May I have your votes please?
Martijn
- [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo and Script.aculo.us sp... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo and Script.ac... Ryan Sonnek
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo and Script.ac... Eelco Hillenius
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo and Scrip... Ryan Sonnek
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo and S... Eelco Hillenius
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo and S... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving Dojo a... Niclas Hedhman
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Moving D... Eelco Hillenius
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: Movi... Niclas Hedhman
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: ... Eelco Hillenius
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Vote: ... Martijn Dashorst
