Excatly :)
Jonathan Locke wrote:
right. i didn't mean at all to imply that wicket isn't high quality enough for serious use, even enterprise use. i hope it is obvious that i think it is. and, as you point out, you can scale apps pretty darn far in wicket already. but there are enterprises and there are Enterprises. all i really meant below is that i would not yet try to build something with a /very/ high volume usage pattern on wicket 1.0. for example, i would not try to base a new amazon.com or yahoo.com type of service on wicket /1.0/. however, if you have a long development cycle anyway, it's likely that 1.1 will be done in a few months anyway, and i believe /that/ really should be sufficient for creating even a site as large as yahoo or amazon. for truly large problems like amazon.com, we're going to need some of these 1.1 features like zero-state. that's all i meant. i guess i probably should have said $1B not $1M... i've got that austin powers problem with money... ;-)
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
