If there's just one DAO, then I can store the data in a Map and not worry about HSQL or anything like that. Actually, I just wrote it in Wicket (it's absolutly frickin' amazing how FEW lines it took) and I'll get it cloned in Tapestry tomorrow and post up both wars. Basicaly, it's just a bare-bones version of your CD-App. I didn't want to make it too complicated because I'm not super efficiant with Tapestry and I didn't want that part to take all day.
-Phil On 7/10/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Kulak wrote: > > >Unless the dynamic images are actually created on the fly, Wicket's > >gonna get slaughtered there since Tapestry will actually copy static > >images from the jar into a public webserver directory. > > > > > > I think Wicket handles the static images pretty efficiently. It would be > interesting to see if there is any performance difference with Tapestry, > but I think not. So Tapestry actually copies the resources to the webapp > directory? A potential problem with that is that you can't be sure that > you have write rights in your webapp dir. You can't even be sure if > there is a filesystem dir at all (might still be a .war, or potentially > some other schema). > > >Maybe a list view of 50 items with edit and delete options? I could > >make a single, thread-safe DAO, and then if you could find a way to > >hit the page a bunch of times with concurrent edits and deletes, it > >would be a nice muli-user test. > > > > > > > > Why should you have just one DAO? Why not an instance per request or > session? > > >That's my idea, but I have no idea how you plan to test it, so > >something else may be more appropriate. > > > > > > I think it would be nice to have a special performance test page. Where > should we put it though? > > Eelco > > >On 7/9/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> If i get 2 wars of an app that does some big rendering (like listviews, > >>dynamic images and that kind of thing) > >> So i don't think hangman will do it really it is a bit to small. > >> > >> Don't know if we really have to test a database. That i don't like. It > >>should be plain pojo's > >> that are in mem created for a list/detail/edit view. > >> > >> What kind of functionality would be a good test? > >> > >> > >> johan > >> > >> > >> Phil Kulak wrote: > >> Is this offer still available? Don't we already have a working Hangman > >>app in both frameworks? If that won't cut it, I'd be glad to write a > >>Tapestry clone of a Wicket app. It would give me a chance to get > >>better acquainted with Tapestry 4. > >> > >>On 6/18/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> then we need 2 the same apps with the same feature set in both frameworks. > >>If somebody is willing to build that and supply me with the 2 wars then > >>i will do a performance test > >>with yourekit.. > >> > >>johan > >> > >> > >>叶卫国 wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Does anybody compare it with tapestry? > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > >> > >> >from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > >> > >> > >> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > >>speed, fast. > >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Wicket-user mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > >>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > >>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > >>speed, fast. > >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&opclick > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Wicket-user mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > >> > >> > >> N琀S^甸殜X�'矈辵辑呧�Z+a妤伶鉂j歗�)�&閞讍⿵ > >>?跽﹦ > >>5瀶{獾歙黑 茩hazV瓃薭澺殨�+y┹v妤偠﹩',电!瀴h�&瑍窞、贽介韱�-y烛 � > >>┹5R > >>璀�"沧+"�m��鹈ir壙倧莨﹑y抚j耽rG谦櫒x%娝V壣 峨 甔�(悍 ~娻zw瓎踚��鍔薼矉玵玷�咤娝l⺋)撸�"rG谦 > >> > >> > >> > >N�HS^�隊X���'���u�����2��Z+a���❪�j�^�)�&�r׆�� > >?�թ� > >5��{�쨺� ƙh��azV�z�b�ۚ��+y��v楂���',��!��h�&���~���w����톋-y�� � > >��5R > >��"��+"�m����ir����ݹ�py��j��rG��ǫ����x%��V�� �� �X���(�� ~��zw���i����l���q���z���l�X��)ߣ�"rG��ǫ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > N�HS^�隊X���'���u�����2��Z+a����❪�j�^�)�&�r׆���� ?�թ� 5��{��쨺� ƙh��azV�z�b�ۚ��+y��v楂���',��!��h�&���~���w����톋-y�� � ��5R ���"��+"�m����ir����ݹ�py��j��rG��ǫ����x%��V�� �� �X���(�� ~��zw���i�����l���q����z����l�X��)ߣ�"rG��ǫ
