Igor Vaynberg wrote:
imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.

the one thing you always hear swing developers bitching about is how they have to fight the layout managers to get the results they want. gridbaglayout is poweful but its a huge pain to work with.

matisse+grouplayout are the holy grail for swing devels, its nice and easy to create layouts. but it still requires a gui to do this, while i can do html easily by hand.
Well, next time also look into the FormLayout of the JGoodies (Forms) fame. It's easy to do by hand, even easier if you use the factories and builders it provides. Excellent library JGoodies, it's my choice as a layout manager for the desktop.
also browser screen space doesnt translate easily to the desktop space. in desktop space you are pixel aware, you are also pixel aware of your fonts and the south east corner of the window. in html you have none of these things.

look at wingS framework examples, they use layout managers. look how rectangular their examples look.

-Igor




On 5/17/06, *Frank Silbermann * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    I, personally, don't care for HTML, and perhaps I might enjoy
    programming in Echo2 better.

    But suppose an employer maintained an HTML fragment with links to
    their
    entire portfolio of web applications, and wanted this fragment to
    appear
    on every page of each web application.  Since someone else is
    maintaining that scrap and keeping it up-to-date, I would not want to
    translate it into Echo 2 and maintain my own copy.

    Would it not likely be easier to incorporate such an HTML scrap
    into a
    Wicket application, versus one written in a framework such as Echo 2
    that abstracted away the HTML completely?


    -----Original Message-----
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Eelco
    Hillenius
    Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
    To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
    Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Google Web Toolkit integration ?

    > It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a look at haxe.org
    <http://haxe.org> if you find
    > it interesting), ...
    ...
    Yeah. I see some advantages of using layout managers - basically the
    same promise as Swing has - but currently I would still prefer using
    HTML for layout. If I would like the GWT way of developing
    applications, I would have choosen Echo 2 a long time ago. GWT looks
    like a next gen Echo to me, though with a very big name behind it, and
    some cool innovations. ... Eelco



    -------------------------------------------------------
    Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
    security?
    Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
    job easier
    Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
    Geronimo
    http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
    <http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642>
    _______________________________________________
    Wicket-user mailing list
    Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user





-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to