We did already break the model contract with 1.2/1.3... would get/setObject->get/setValue be a huge hassle? Or am I spacing something here?
Jonathan Locke wrote: > > > Made a few more changes. I think it's getting shorter/better. > > My one regret looking at this documentation is that I wish > IModel.get/setObject were actually IModel.get/setValue. Or was there some > crazy reason we didn't do this? It would be much easier and more natural > to talk about a model's value this way... > > > Jonathan Locke wrote: >> >> >> Nice work. I made a few small changes and rephrased the first paragraph >> to be even more specific. Maybe it could be tweaked a little more, but I >> think this sums it up better now: >> >> "In Wicket, a model holds a value for a component to display and/or edit. >> How exactly this value is held is determined by a given model's >> implementation of the wicket.model.IModel interface. This interface >> decouples a component from the data which forms its value. This in turn >> decouples the whole Wicket framework from any and all details of model >> storage, such as the details of a given persistence technology. As far as >> Wicket itself is concerned, a model is anything that implements the >> IModel interface, no matter how it might do that." >> >> It does feel like this is the best place to show the IModel interface >> since readers will be wondering what it looks like already. It sounds >> scarier than it is, so why delay? >> >> >> Loren Rosen wrote: >>> >>> I've saved my rewritten version. (See >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models) >>> Comments by everyone from experts to complete newbies >>> are most welcome. Doubtless there are things that are confusing or >>> flat-out wrong. >>> >>> In addition to rephrasing or rewriting a lot of material, and adding a >>> few things, I >>> excised some details I thought would be distracting for a beginner. Some >>> of this >>> material is, I think, still useful, perhaps in a slightly more advanced >>> "More about >>> Models" page. >>> >>> >>> igor.vaynberg wrote: >>>> >>>> go ahead and edit the page...the wiki is versioned i think so we can >>>> always >>>> roll back. >>>> >>>> when you are done with the majority let us know and we will review the >>>> changes. >>>> >>>> -igor >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/15/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When I first started using Wicket I found the information on models a >>>>> little >>>>> hard to follow. So now I'd like to revise the "Working with Wicket >>>>> models" >>>>> wiki page >>>>> ( >>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models >>>>> ) >>>>> to improve this. I'd be happy to outline what I think should be >>>>> improved >>>>> (though this is a little hard to do in detail short of simply >>>>> annotating >>>>> the >>>>> page) or I can just plunge ahead and draft a revised page. If I do the >>>>> latter I could potentially post it somewhere else for comment instead >>>>> of >>>>> directly replacing the existing page on the wiki. Perhaps we need a >>>>> 'in >>>>> draft' part of the wiki for working on long pages like this one. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, another alternative is for me to gradually introduce changes >>>>> to >>>>> the wiki page over a span of days, giving people a chance to comment >>>>> as I >>>>> go. >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/revising-the-%22Working-with-Wicket-models%22-page-tf3016921.html#a8378321 >>>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >>>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >>>>> share >>>>> your >>>>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >>>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wicket-user mailing list >>>>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >>>> your >>>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wicket-user mailing list >>>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/revising-the-%22Working-with-Wicket-models%22-page-tf3016921.html#a8515678 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
