On 17/04/2019 22:36, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:29, Alexandre Hocquet wrote:
what? then a lot of wikipedia
articles should be labelled as {{secondary sources needed}})
Exactly. Sourcing as a whole across wikipedia already relies too
heavily on primary sources. I regularly tag articles as such.

Well, fair enough then. Good luck for your crusade, and thanks for your interesting views about what constitutes primary, secondary and tertiary. I guess I now have an answer about how much sympathy my suggestion would bring.


--
***********************************************
Alexandre Hocquet
Archives Henri Poincaré & Science History Institute
[email protected]
https://www.sciencehistory.org/profile/alexandre-hocquet
https://poincare.univ-lorraine.fr/fr/membre-titulaire/alexandre-hocquet
***********************************************

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to