This looks like a job for Wikisource. If nothing else, so long as we can
verify their CC licensing is compatible, we can archive and preserve them
in perpetuity on WS. Unfortunately I've scarcely contributed to WS
personally. I've reached out to a WS admin that I know from Commons. When
they reply I'll cc them on this thread.
V/r
TJW/GMG
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Alexandre Hocquet <
alexandre.hocq...@univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:
> On 17/04/2019 22:36, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:29, Alexandre Hocquet wrote:
> >> what? then a lot of wikipedia
> >> articles should be labelled as {{secondary sources needed}})
> > Exactly. Sourcing as a whole across wikipedia already relies too
> > heavily on primary sources. I regularly tag articles as such.
>
> Well, fair enough then. Good luck for your crusade, and thanks for your
> interesting views about what constitutes primary, secondary and
> tertiary. I guess I now have an answer about how much sympathy my
> suggestion would bring.
>
>
> --
> ***********************************************
> Alexandre Hocquet
> Archives Henri Poincaré & Science History Institute
> alexandre.hocq...@univ-lorraine.fr
> https://www.sciencehistory.org/profile/alexandre-hocquet
> https://poincare.univ-lorraine.fr/fr/membre-titulaire/alexandre-hocquet
> ***********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
