This sounds right to me. I suspect this might be the first time I posted here, but Stuart's comment makes sense. There really are several entities, such as the activities of Paul Allen's institute's work in AI and scholarship; but, if Wikipedia is to tie in with these cc-by research documents, it seems to me that many of those documents are about topics already in Wikipedia; linking to them, updating the Wikipedia topic to reflect new information by way of deep interoperability and machine reading techniques makes sense.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:25 PM Stuart A. Yeates <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that there are organisations already organised, funded and > operating to preserve and promote open-access research, we might want > to think about focusing on getting deep interoperability with them, > rather than sucking all the content into Wikisource, where we can't > provide half the functionality that they can. > > cheers > stuart > -- > ...let us be heard from red core to black sky > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 09:47, Timothy Wood <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > This looks like a job for Wikisource. If nothing else, so long as we can > > verify their CC licensing is compatible, we can archive and preserve them > > in perpetuity on WS. Unfortunately I've scarcely contributed to WS > > personally. I've reached out to a WS admin that I know from Commons. When > > they reply I'll cc them on this thread. > > > > V/r > > TJW/GMG > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Alexandre Hocquet < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 17/04/2019 22:36, Stuart A. Yeates wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:29, Alexandre Hocquet wrote: > > > >> what? then a lot of wikipedia > > > >> articles should be labelled as {{secondary sources needed}}) > > > > Exactly. Sourcing as a whole across wikipedia already relies too > > > > heavily on primary sources. I regularly tag articles as such. > > > > > > Well, fair enough then. Good luck for your crusade, and thanks for your > > > interesting views about what constitutes primary, secondary and > > > tertiary. I guess I now have an answer about how much sympathy my > > > suggestion would bring. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *********************************************** > > > Alexandre Hocquet > > > Archives Henri Poincaré & Science History Institute > > > [email protected] > > > https://www.sciencehistory.org/profile/alexandre-hocquet > > > > https://poincare.univ-lorraine.fr/fr/membre-titulaire/alexandre-hocquet > > > *********************************************** > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wiki-research-l mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wiki-research-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
