https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17806
--- Comment #15 from Mike.lifeguard <[email protected]> 2009-05-21 17:51:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > I agree, that would be an improvement. But there are still logs with no > target, > and plenty of pages that are not heavily watched. See bug 18866. > The issue is that the use of oversight-like tools has become quite > controversial on enwiki, so users want to be able to see all those actions > recorded in one place to be able to challenge them, review them one by one if > they're sysop. If they are hosted in the deletion log, for 1 of those actions, > there would be maybe 1000 deletions, they would be lost among deletions. So > you > couldn't find them easily, or you'd have to extract them specifically, which > would be a pain and not live. OK, but then why are you not also concerned about losing one of the normal deletions in the deletion log? It would be "hidden" by 999 other normal deletions, which isn't so different from being hidden by 1000 normal deletions plus 1 "hiding". This sounds to me like you don't trust your sysops. That is not a technical issue which should be reported to bugzilla, or which can be fixed in the source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
