https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49860
--- Comment #27 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Portuguese Wikipedia already used CAPTCHA that way for five years. It was > > removed in April (see bug 41745) as it was said a community decision was > > necessary to keep it. > > (In reply to comment #19) > > And, to make this perfectly clear, almost everyone commented that their > > support to turn captcha on was only until some other - better - way to avoid > > vandalisms was found. > > Hi. > > Can one of you please provide examples of edits that you want to prevent? > What > edits would you like to stop that you believe adding a CAPTCHA will prevent? > Please provide as many examples as you would like. The more examples you can > provide, the better feedback you can get, I think. There are a number of > developers actively watching this bug report. :-) > > I think we should focus on the types of edits you want to prevent (the > problem) > rather than focusing on adding a CAPTCHA (a proposed solution). > > And for what it's worth, a wiki can easily disable or deter edits by > anonymous > users by using [[w:pt:MediaWiki:Titleblacklist]] or > [[w:pt:Special:AbuseFilter]]. Though you can't use the AbuseFilter to force a > CAPTCHA (yet: bug 18110). I'm trying to ascertain if there is anyone in our community who knows how to implement those suggestions. Aparently, "easily" means something different down here... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
