https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59854
Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #2 from Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> --- I don't see exactly how the two are exactly the same. You gave a dictionary definition that doesn't prove or disprove your case and (what appears to me as) an inflammatory response to a perfectly valid question. Just because you have (WMF) in your name and MZMcBride doesn't mean that you hold some sort of authority over what bugs are valid and what aren't, open up your viewpoint a bit. For me, and I think many web designers, typography refers to the font and font-related styles (font size, line height, etc.). It does *not* refer to how things are visually laid out on the page (which includes padding, margins, link styles, etc.). I tried out the typography refresh myself earlier, but disabled it because it messed with things like link styles in the sidebar, sidebar width, and various other things that proved to be rather annoying. If these changes are intentional along with your "typography refresh", then MZMcBride is correct in that the name of the feature is misleading, as it includes other changes beyond the font. Reopening this bug as it is perfectly valid -- either split off the layout changes to a separate feature, or stop calling the feature "typography refresh". And Jared, please get off your high horse. Before simply closing this again because you don't like it and it's your-way-or-the-highway, try providing valid reasoning for what you say (and no, dictionary definitions don't count. A "valid reason" would be something like "The layout changes are included with the font changes because [insert reason on why they two sets of changes should be bundled] and if they were not included, then [insert downside that would happen if only one change were enabled without the other]"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
