https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59854
MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #7 from MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> --- (In reply to comment #4) > This is a fricking /beta feature/. If it was a core feature that was live in > production I could understand a bug but it's a fricking /beta feature/ - > freedom of expression reigns. We are trying out ideas, innovating which is > sometimes uncomfortable. Are you really suggested we waste man hours on a > rename and discussing silly bugs like this? This kind of thing stifles > innovation and was the exact reason BetaFeatures was created. I hope if some > community member launches a BetaFeature (which they can and I encourage them > to do so in the VectorBeta extension) has a crazy idea you won't open bugs > against it repelling their ideas. In your mind, the idea is to create beta features, but never improve them? I don't think that's a very sensible approach. > Please respect my decision to resolve this as invalid as the /ONLY/ existing > developer on this product. Perhaps you're the _only_ developer due to your poor "this is MINE!" attitude. You asked to not be involved with this issue, which I can respect. But you then came along and _inserted yourself_ into this bug report by copying yourself on it and changing the bug's status, without addressing comment 2 or comment 0. This isn't appropriate behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l