https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59854

Steven Walling <swall...@wikimedia.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |swall...@wikimedia.org

--- Comment #5 from Steven Walling <swall...@wikimedia.org> ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Closely related to bug 59815, the "typography refresh" beta feature now
> includes a layout change, making the label "typography refresh" misleading
> and
> inaccurate.
> 
> Several users have recommended putting the layout change(s) into a separate
> experiment that's appropriately labeled. I've yet to hear any argument for
> why
> this would be a bad idea.

As Jared tried to explain, column width, measure or line length is not a
"layout" issue. It's a part of the usual definition of what typography
is.[1][2] If you're claiming that setting a max-width in CSS is outside the
scope of a typography beta, that's 100% factually inaccurate. 

1. http://webtypography.net/Rhythm_and_Proportion/Horizontal_Motion/2.1.2/
2.
https://www.fonts.com/content/learning/fontology/level-2/text-typography/length-column-width

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to