https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
--- Comment #23 from Pavel Selitskas [wizardist] <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #22) > Pavel, thanks a lot for going through the trouble of collecting data via > looking glasses, although I'd personally be more interested to get > traceroutes > from users that experience the issues. I doubt PCCW's backbone has bandwidth > troubles with us. Yes, they can adjust priority for traffic coming from different consumers, but that would imply issues had Hong Kong only a couple of 1Gb links to the West Coast. :) > Oh, and finally, the third traceroute you sent was actually from Amsterdam -- > first hop is "ams", plus 84ms from HK to Ashburn is 2-3 times the speed of > light or something :) Yeah, sorry, my bad. 3 ge-7-0-0.hkg11.ip4.tinet.net (213.254.227.77) 4 msec 0 msec 4 msec 4 xe-11-0-1.was10.ip4.tinet.net (141.136.110.198) 232 msec 232 msec 236 msec Here's a part of a proper trace from PCCW. Nothing special at first glance: it moors to Seattle, although they route traffic through Tinet SpA, and it takes quite a large amount of time (~230ms vs standard ~150ms). If you look at their backbone network map, you can see that Tinet doesn't have submarine links coming from Asia directly to Washington - they're all terminated in California. I don't know why they make it this way, could their maps be just outdated :) Their ping result a half more than normal is not okay though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
