Nemo <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |
          Component|Skin and page rendering     |Extensions requests
            Product|MediaWiki                   |MediaWiki extensions
            Summary|Wikipedia Content is        |Provide "twitter card"
                   |missing "twitter card"      |syntax for proper display
                   |syntax for proper display   |

--- Comment #21 from Nemo <> ---
(In reply to Jared Zimmerman (WMF) from comment #17)
> I ask again, what is the argument against this in your mind, "social issue"
> is too vague for me to understand.

It's about time you familiarise with the concept then, especially as it's the
WMF way to call something that the community calls with a more aggressive term.
Thanks Legoktm and Quiddity for providing training.

(In reply to Dario Taraborelli from comment #20)
> Wikimedia sites already have provisions "for the benefit of single sites" or
> 3rd party partners: carriers participating in Wikipedia Zero or Pediapress
> are the most obvious examples that come to my mind

None of these is in MediaWiki core and both are very different situations from
what proposed here (though they have their issues):
* Wikipedia Zero is a history of partnerships but from MediaWiki perspective is
comparable to action=print (neutral technology),
* Collection extension links/linked PediaPress as a component of the
infrastracture relied on them and they are the authors of the extension.

Anyway, moving this to Extension requests until there is evidence of this being
considered appropriate for core.
I'm rather disappointed that time is being wasted by us here on surreal
conversations when there is a simple ten lines patch that allegedly improves
the situation for everyone (without special consideration for specific

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to