https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26092

Rich Farmbrough <rich...@farmbrough.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rich...@farmbrough.co.uk

--- Comment #16 from Rich Farmbrough <rich...@farmbrough.co.uk> 2011-01-04 
11:06:41 UTC ---
I have to agree with Aryeh,  there was a pipe-dram about Lua. Now that's dead
this needs escalating. 

We currently have a situation where templates can stop working for mysterious
reasons.  We have simple stuff ten-year-old children used to hack on pocket
money computers 30 years ago, that professional software engineers are sweating
blood to achieve (or not).   

To simply dismiss this crying need because of Lua was bad enough, but because
of a throw-away comment on a mailing list - surely not.


Current situation:

o Frustrated template writers
o Inefficient (horrendously inefficient) code
o Missing functionality
o Reduced productivity

Requested situation

o Happy template writers
o Fast code
o buckets of functionality
o Huge leaps in productivity

What's not to like?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to