Esc3300 added a comment.
For clarity's sake, maybe we should hold discussions about editorial choices on Wikidata directly. Also langcom members should stated that they are expressing the langcom view and reference the policy or procedure they are using to base their argument on. It may also be preferable if, when a user who is a langcom member, requests a new code, they don't express any langcom view on the code. Alternatively, it may seem that the process is somewhat random or arbitrary. At this stage, it seems clear that: - the request for the new code is complete with samples - langcom is aware of the request and hasn't raised any concerns within the scope of their review activity - there is a consensus on Wikidata to use new code If there are any technical points developers or product people want us to look into, please say so. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T285156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Esc3300 Cc: So9q, Ainali, Epidosis, Shushugah, Manuel, Nikki, Esc3300, Mbch331, jhsoby, Amire80, Lydia_Pintscher, ChristianKl, Mahir256, Aklapper, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Dinadineke, DannyS712, Nandana, tabish.shaikh91, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Jayprakash12345, JakeTheDeveloper, QZanden, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, TheDJ
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
