Amire80 added a comment.
In T285156#7324288 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T285156#7324288>, @Esc3300 wrote: > For clarity's sake, maybe we should hold discussions about editorial choices on Wikidata directly. Also langcom members should stated that they are expressing the langcom view and reference the policy or procedure they are using to base their argument on. It may also be preferable if, when a user who is a langcom member, requests a new code, they don't express any langcom view on the code. Alternatively, it may seem that the process is somewhat random or arbitrary. > > At this stage, it seems clear that: > > - the request for the new code is complete with samples > - langcom is aware of the request and hasn't raised any concerns within the scope of their review activity To clarify, this is not Langcom approval. What I'm saying is that it's not relevant to the usual kind of thing that Langcom is doing. Precisely because of this, it's the product developers and designers that should review this and not Langcom. By any account, this is not a request for a //language//, but for a special case. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T285156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Amire80 Cc: So9q, Ainali, Epidosis, Shushugah, Manuel, Nikki, Esc3300, Mbch331, jhsoby, Amire80, Lydia_Pintscher, ChristianKl, Mahir256, Aklapper, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Dinadineke, DannyS712, Nandana, tabish.shaikh91, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Jayprakash12345, JakeTheDeveloper, QZanden, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, TheDJ
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
