mobrovac added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114443#1777558, @Ottomata wrote:
> @gwicke, I think this may be a problem. From my perspective, the goal of > this project is a generalized event service with well designed and > standardized schemas for all of WMF. For this MVP, we have chosen to model > change events because that is what you are interested in. This is an 'MVP', > and will likely require iteration after the first deployment. I don't think > having a live services production goal based on this is realistic. I don't see these two as being mutually-exclusive. In order to meet the end goal of a generalised event service we are starting with the Services' use case. The MVP is part of one of our quarterly goals. We have almost finalised the events and almost settled on the hardware, so from our point of view we are ready to start building our change propagation system which relies on the basic edit events. And, as you state, the MVP is going to be a first stab at this (a prototype of sorts) which will be improved upon as other services/systems are ported to it. Which points make you think having an MVP up and running this quarter? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114443 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Ottomata, mobrovac Cc: Milimetric, RobLa-WMF, brion, intracer, Smalyshev, mark, MZMcBride, Krinkle, EBernhardson, bd808, Joe, dr0ptp4kt, madhuvishy, Nuria, ori, faidon, aaron, GWicke, mobrovac, Eevans, Ottomata, Matanya, Aklapper, JAllemandou, jkroll, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, daniel, Mbch331, Jay8g, Ltrlg, jeremyb, Legoktm _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
