mobrovac added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114443#1782101, @Nuria wrote:
> I sure hope we are not thinking of having a node rest endpoint and another > one based on eventlogging at the same time, More than for technical reasons > because it really makes me think that we cannot collaborate. I was talking about the consumer side of things in my previous post, not about the producer side. Our QG is about the whole pipeline: (a) producer; (b) kafka cluster; and (c) change propagation system as a consumer. The way I see it, we have discussed / worked on (a) and (b), so now we'd like to get started on (c) in order to meet our goal. > After our irc meeting of last Friday It was clear that the majority of > attendees favor a solution based on EL and i was under the impression this is > what we were going for. As for the //python vs node REST proxy// discussion, they are supposed to be functionally equal, i.e. they should be interchangeable. Given that the node proxy is ready to use, I don't see harm in us using, in this way allowing us to complete this quarter's goal. That makes me think - how would the python service be deployed? Does that need some extra (puppet) work? In the case of the node proxy, that's a matter of writing 5 lines in `ops/puppet`. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114443 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Ottomata, mobrovac Cc: Milimetric, RobLa-WMF, brion, intracer, Smalyshev, mark, MZMcBride, Krinkle, EBernhardson, bd808, Joe, dr0ptp4kt, madhuvishy, Nuria, ori, faidon, aaron, GWicke, mobrovac, Eevans, Ottomata, Matanya, Aklapper, JAllemandou, jkroll, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, daniel, Mbch331, Jay8g, Ltrlg, jeremyb, Legoktm _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
