2013/4/8 Mathieu Stumpf <[email protected]>: > Le 2013-04-08 15:02, Luca Martinelli a écrit : > >> What I tried to say is: we don't mind if we go back in a page history >> and find a red link to a template, nobody cares, because we all know >> that a template has been deleted/substituted *for a reason* - that we >> even discussed for a VERY long time. What we DO care is that the >> article has *right now* the correct data - and this will be easier >> with Wikidata. I wouldn't have been its main sponsor in it.wp, if it >> wasn't for this. > > > When I look in the history, I want to see the data which where used then : > there are the correct data of this history context. The "current" page may > be automaticaly edited to match the current wikidata entries it refers to, > but this changes should appears in the history, just like it's done with > bots. > > So, no, I don't care that the last revision of an article uses the "correct > data", because "correct data" is an ambiguous term. What I hope to see, is > that the last revision article uses the last revision of the wikidata > entries it needs; or at least the value it had the last time that a commit > was made to update this value. And when I look in the history, I want to see > the value that the article used to use then. Otherwise it would be history > counterfeiting.
Ok, I give up. Ask the devs to solve this problem, open a bug about it, whatever. For the records I *do not* see as a problem as of now, since IMVHO we've got other priorities to deal with - first of all: filling the items with statements, and possibly completing the statements with sources, in order to make the data on Wikidata usable on Wikipedia. -- Luca "Sannita" Martinelli http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Sannita _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
