Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in.
Sk!d On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki <[email protected]> wrote: > Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the > interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by > the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other > projects, thank you very much for the help! > > I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for > local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces > are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want > to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use > AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you > want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the > string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and > codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.) > > With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several > things: > * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts. > Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias > make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are > two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia > that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many > redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been > removed with a bot. > > * Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make > place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on > Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a > disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for > disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from > [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where > we need to fix this.) > > * Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because > the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was > renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not > recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. > So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking > to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis > are in. > > > Let's clean this mess up! > > > Romaine > > --- > http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
