Could you also offer the same service for other wikipedias? Would be really useful.
Thanks for the service. - Svavar Kjarrval On 08/07/13 23:05, swuensch wrote: > My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation pages > and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported to: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict> > > > The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot > scanned allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there are > other Conflicts meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at two > items. These get reported to > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/conflict> many of the > conflicts are because the items should be merged or because someone > removed a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label. It would be > nice if other would help working on this list. If a conflict gets > fixed you should delete it from the list. > > Sk!d > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_w...@yahoo.com > <mailto:romaine_w...@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this > category: > https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina > > Let me know when you have created such list. > > Romaine > > > > --- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch /<swuen...@gmail.com > <mailto:swuen...@gmail.com>>/* wrote: > > > From: swuensch <swuen...@gmail.com <mailto:swuen...@gmail.com>> > Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot > To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." > <wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > <mailto:wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>> > Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM > > > Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under > > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict > > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict> > > This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and > update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that > with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. > I only would need a nl category were the items with a > Disambiguation Template are located in. > > Sk!d > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki > <romaine_w...@yahoo.com > <http://mc/compose?to=romaine_w...@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of > the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this > work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot > of work is done by users form other projects, thank you > very much for the help! > > I have checked the complete template namespace and > category namespace for local interwiki's and all are > removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now > clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller > Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are > local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the > latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you > want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me > personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But > it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can > also do it for you.) > > With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came > across several things: > * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of > interwikiconflicts. Certain genus do only have one species > under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together > one article, while others want two articles as it are two > layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English > Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was > a list to which many redirects were linking which were > used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot. > > * Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of > articles to make place for a disambiguation page haven't > been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a > group of articles, one of the links was to a > disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could > check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a > template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that > wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.) > > * Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are > still local because the local interwiki links to a page > that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while > this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not > recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one > added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all > interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that > is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis > are in. > > > Let's clean this mess up! > > > Romaine > > --- > http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > <http://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > <http://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
