Thanks.

In the case of the Icelandic Wikipedia, disambiguations are only marked
with the template ‚Aðgreining‘ (
https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sni%C3%B0:A%C3%B0greining). Don't think
there are any variables supported so you'd only need to search for
‚{{Aðgreining}}‘ (case-insensitive).

With regards,
Svavar Kjarrval

On 09/07/13 07:28, swuensch wrote:
> Yes of course I only need a Category or at least a Template to start with.
>
> My bot than checks the links. And if there is no problem adds
> descriptions from
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js and sets
> P107:Q11651459 with a ref to the start Wikipedia.
>
> I paused this task a while ago because there where to many conflicts
> to work on and I don't have much time right now to solve them by myself.
>
> Sk!d
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Svavar Kjarrval <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Could you also offer the same service for other wikipedias? Would
>     be really useful.
>
>     Thanks for the service.
>
>     - Svavar Kjarrval
>
>
>     On 08/07/13 23:05, swuensch wrote:
>>     My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation
>>     pages and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported
>>     to:
>>     https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
>>     
>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict>
>>
>>
>>     The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot
>>     scanned allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there
>>     are other Conflicts meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at
>>     two items. These get reported to
>>     https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict
>>     <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/conflict> many of
>>     the conflicts are because the items should be merged or because
>>     someone removed a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label.
>>     It would be nice if other would help working on this list. If a
>>     conflict gets fixed you should delete it from the list.
>>
>>     Sk!d
>>      
>>
>>     On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this
>>         category:
>>         https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina
>>
>>         Let me know when you have created such list.
>>
>>         Romaine
>>
>>
>>
>>         --- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch /<[email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>>             From: swuensch <[email protected]
>>             <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>             Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot
>>             To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project."
>>             <[email protected]
>>             <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>             Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM
>>
>>
>>             Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under
>>             
>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
>>             
>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict>
>>
>>             This list is little bit old but I can start the task
>>             again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to
>>             make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page
>>             there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were
>>             the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in.
>>
>>             Sk!d
>>
>>
>>             On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki
>>             <[email protected]
>>             <http://mc/[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64%
>>                 of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of
>>                 this work has been done by the Dutch community, but
>>                 also a lot of work is done by users form other
>>                 projects, thank you very much for the help!
>>
>>                 I have checked the complete template namespace and
>>                 category namespace for local interwiki's and all are
>>                 removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now
>>                 clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller
>>                 Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki
>>                 are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download
>>                 the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump.
>>                 If you want to know what query you need exactly,
>>                 e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a
>>                 bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes
>>                 easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
>>
>>                 With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we
>>                 came across several things:
>>                 * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of
>>                 interwikiconflicts. Certain genus do only have one
>>                 species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make
>>                 that together one article, while others want two
>>                 articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical
>>                 tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that
>>                 created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to
>>                 which many redirects were linking which were used for
>>                 interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
>>
>>                 * Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings
>>                 of articles to make place for a disambiguation page
>>                 haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an
>>                 item of a group of articles, one of the links was to
>>                 a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot
>>                 could check for disambiguation pages (based on the
>>                 presence of a template from
>>                 [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it)
>>                 so that we know where we need to fix this.)
>>
>>                 * Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis
>>                 are still local because the local interwiki links to
>>                 a page that is a redirect because the page was
>>                 renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most
>>                 interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is
>>                 the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we
>>                 need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a
>>                 redirect linking to a page that is in the same item
>>                 as the page where the local interwikis are in.
>>
>>
>>                 Let's clean this mess up!
>>
>>
>>                 Romaine
>>
>>                 ---
>>                 http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
>>
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 Wikidata-l mailing list
>>                 [email protected]
>>                 <http://mc/[email protected]>
>>                 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>>
>>             -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Wikidata-l mailing list
>>             [email protected]
>>             <http://mc/[email protected]>
>>             https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Wikidata-l mailing list
>>         [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Wikidata-l mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wikidata-l mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to