Yes of course I only need a Category or at least a Template to start with. My bot than checks the links. And if there is no problem adds descriptions from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js and sets P107:Q11651459 with a ref to the start Wikipedia.
I paused this task a while ago because there where to many conflicts to work on and I don't have much time right now to solve them by myself. Sk!d On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Svavar Kjarrval <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you also offer the same service for other wikipedias? Would be > really useful. > > Thanks for the service. > > - Svavar Kjarrval > > > On 08/07/13 23:05, swuensch wrote: > > My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation pages > and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported to: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict > > The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot scanned > allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there are other Conflicts > meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at two items. These get reported > to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict many of the > conflicts are because the items should be merged or because someone removed > a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label. It would be nice if other > would help working on this list. If a conflict gets fixed you should delete > it from the list. > > Sk!d > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki <[email protected]>wrote: > >> All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this category: >> https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina >> >> Let me know when you have created such list. >> >> Romaine >> >> >> >> --- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch <[email protected]>* wrote: >> >> >> From: swuensch <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot >> To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." < >> [email protected]> >> Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM >> >> >> Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict >> This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. >> I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every >> disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl >> category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in. >> >> Sk!d >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the >> interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by >> the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other >> projects, thank you very much for the help! >> >> I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for >> local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces >> are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want >> to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use >> AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you >> want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the >> string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and >> codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.) >> >> With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several >> things: >> * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts. >> Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias >> make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are >> two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia >> that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many >> redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been >> removed with a bot. >> >> * Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make >> place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on >> Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a >> disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for >> disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from >> [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where >> we need to fix this.) >> >> * Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local >> because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the >> page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do >> not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to >> Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect >> linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local >> interwikis are in. >> >> >> Let's clean this mess up! >> >> >> Romaine >> >> --- >> http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> >> >> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing > [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
