This notability guideline for geographic features, both current and historical, will indeed be a cornestone for building upon Wikidata!
It would not include all man-made structures yet, but I hope that would be the trend. I hope we can develop tools and technologies to bridge the data between OSM/OHM and Wikidata. Susanna 2014-03-20 11:51 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>: > On 20 March 2014 06:58, Susanna Ånäs <susanna.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [Snip other interesting stuff; CCs again trimmed] > > > Do the notability guidelines of Wikimedia allow storing only important > > places? > > English Wikipedia has a de facto guideline of considering any > settlement which is on a reliable and independent map or gazetteer to > be notable enough to have an article; (the current draft proposal to > formalise this is at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NGEO> > > Wikidata notability guidelines accept anything with a Wikipedia > article (in any language) *or* which is "a clearly identifiable > conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the > sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available > references." > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Historic mailing list > histo...@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
