Am 28.05.2014 11:44, schrieb Markus Krötzsch: > This one point requires a tiny remark: there is no problem in OWL or RDF to > use > the same URI as a property, an individual, and a class in different contexts. > The only thing that OWL (DL) forbids is to use one property for literal values > (like string) and for object values (like other items), but this would not > occur > in our case anyway since we have clearly defined types. I completely agree > with > all the rest :-)
Yea, I didn't mean to say that there is an issue with representing this in RDF, but with mapping to RDF vocabularies. Having a relatively limited and stable set of properties to map makes that a lot easier. -- daniel -- Daniel Kinzler Senior Software Developer Wikimedia Deutschland Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
