Hi, I basically proposed a two layers model in extended discussions :
Administrative units | Administrative unit type | Administrative unit
classes by country
City Of London       | City of the UK           | Type of administrative
unit of the UK
Lorraine             | French Region            | Type of administrative
unit of France

Where going one step left in the table reads ''instance of''. This seem
close to your ''helper item'' model.




2014-06-10 13:44 GMT+02:00 Markus Krötzsch <[email protected]>:

> On 10/06/14 11:11, Luca Martinelli wrote:
>
>> We may possibly use an ad hoc item "City of United Kingdom", subclass of
>> "city" and "UK administrative division", may we?
>>
>
> Sure, that's possible. Maybe this is even necessary. I had suggested to
> link to "city status in the UK" -- but there is no item "town status in the
> UK" so one would need to have helper items there as well. If we need new
> items in either case, the class-based modelling seems nicer since it fits
> into the existing class hierarchy as you suggest.
>
> Markus
>
>
>
>
>> L.
>>
>> Il 10/giu/2014 10:21 "Markus Krötzsch" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
>>
>>
>>     On 07/06/14 00:40, Joe Filceolaire wrote:
>>
>>         Well they can ask.....
>>
>>         As there is no real definition of what is a city and what the
>>         limits of
>>         each city are I'm not sure they will get a useful answer. The
>>         population
>>         of the "City of London" (Q23311), for instance, is only 7,375!
>>         Should we
>>         change it from 'instance of:city' to 'instance of:village'?
>>
>>
>>     Side remark: in the UK, "city" and "town" are special legal statuses
>>     of settlements. This terminology is what "City of London" refers to.
>>     There is a clear and crisp definition for what this means, but it is
>>     not what we mean by our class "city" in Wikidata. In particular,
>>     this has no direct relationship to size: the largest UK "towns" have
>>     over 100k inhabitants.
>>
>>     The class "city" is used for "relatively large and permanent human
>>     settlement[s]" [1], which does not say much (because the vagueness
>>     of "relatively"). Maybe we should even wonder if "city" is a good
>>     class to use in Wikidata. Saying that something has been awarded
>>     city status in the UK (Q1867820) has a clear meaning. Saying that
>>     something is a "human settlement" is also rather clear. But drawing
>>     the line between "village", "city" and "town" is quite tricky, and
>>     will probably never be done uniformly across the data.
>>
>>     Conclusion: if you are looking for, say, human settlements with more
>>     than 100k inhabitants, then you should be searching for just that
>>     (which I think is basically what you also are saying below :-).
>>
>>     Markus
>>
>>     [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__City
>>
>>     <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City>
>>
>>
>>
>>         Even a basic query like 'people born in the Czech republic' has
>>         problems. Should it include people born in Czechoslovakia or the
>>         Austro-Hungarian provinces of Bohemia and Moravia? To exclude
>>         these the
>>         query needs to check not just if the 'place of birth' of an item
>>         is 'in
>>         the administrative entity:Czech Republic' today but whether that
>> was
>>         true on the 'date of birth' of each of those people.
>>
>>         This isn't to say that such queries are not useful. Just to
>>         point out
>>         that real world data is tricky. The cool thing is that we are
>>         going to
>>         have the data in Wikidata to make it theoretically feasible to
>> drill
>>         down and get answers to these tricky questions. Once the data is
>>         there,
>>         open licensed for anyone to use, then it is just a matter of a
>>         letting
>>         loose a thousand PhDs to devise clever ways to query it.
>>
>>         If we build it they will come!
>>
>>         At least that is my understanding.
>>
>>         Joe
>>
>>
>>         On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Jeroen De Dauw
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]
>>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>__>> wrote:
>>
>>              Hey Yury,
>>
>>              We are indeed planning to use the Ask query language for
>>         Wikidata.
>>
>>              People will be able to define queries on dedicated query
>>         pages that
>>              contain a query entity. These query entities will represent
>>         things
>>              such as "The cities with highest population in Europe".
>>         People will
>>              then be able to access the result for those queries via the
>>         web API
>>              and be able to embed different views on them into wiki
>>         pages. These
>>              views will be much like SMW result formats, and we might
>>         indeed be
>>              able to share code between the two projects for that.
>>
>>              This functionality is still some way off though. We still
>>         need to do
>>              a lot of work, such as creating a nice visual query builder.
>> To
>>              already get something out to the users, we plan to enable
>> more
>>              simple queries via the web API in the near future.
>>
>>              Cheers
>>
>>              --
>>              Jeroen De Dauw - http://www.bn2vs.com
>>              Software craftsmanship advocate
>>              Evil software architect at Wikimedia Germany
>>              ~=[,,_,,]:3
>>
>>              _________________________________________________
>>
>>              Wikidata-l mailing list
>>         [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.__wikimedia.org
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>         https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>         <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _________________________________________________
>>
>>         Wikidata-l mailing list
>>         [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>         <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _________________________________________________
>>
>>     Wikidata-l mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>> >
>>      https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>     <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to