@Nemo: I guess a class of properties ''external identifier definition property'' with isbn <instance of> external identifier prop could be useful as well.
2015-04-04 11:16 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>: > Stas Malyshev, 04/04/2015 09:29:>> away from the old layout and that is > very welcome. Singling out the > >> >external resources does not make sense at this time. > > It is true that more structure in general would be good, but I think > > there's some difference between external IDs and other properties - > > namely, the former convey almost no information useful to a human > > Did you mean the opposite? > > Stas Malyshev, 04/04/2015 10:22: > >> >I agree this would be a nice idea. I believe it would be relatively easy >>> to do, >>> >if only properties could have properties of their own. >>> >> AFAIK they can, e.g.https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P35 >> > > Indeed: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1628 is already used to > mark properties ("identifiers") already defined in other ontologies. > https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target= > Property%3AP1628&namespace=120 > > Looks like we just need to add this property to more properties. Whether > this piece of information is used for presentational purposes seems > secondary, or at least I don't see a compelling argument for it yet. > > Nemo > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
