Citiranje Erik Moeller <[email protected]>: > Have we considered separating in some way (in the UI, and possibly the data > model) properties which track identifiers in external databases vs. > properties that describe the item using Wikidata-internal links? As more > and more external identifiers are added, it's easy to get lost in them > while looking for the right property to describe an item. > > We're effectively already doing this with Wikimedia identifiers by calling > them "sitelinks" and it seems like a potential logical extension of that > concept to group other kinds of external identifiers in their own section > rather than having CANTIC, BIBSYS identifiers, Freebase identifiers or even > DMOZ links mixed together with the primary descriptors of an author or > work, for example.
I agree this would be a nice idea. I believe it would be relatively easy to do, if only properties could have properties of their own. _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
