Nice solution, I'll post a link at Wikipedia:Torget. It is a bit like making a traffic statistic by using a road cam, so it wasn't really what I was looking for..
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> wrote: > I set up one of my tools for you (nowiki) for [1] : > https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/duplicity.php > > It doesn't give you a list (though I could add that), rather presents you > with a random one and tries to find a matching item. Basically, what you > need to do anyway for due diligence. > > > Not quite sure what else you need, too much "somehow" in your description... > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM John Erling Blad <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We lack several maintenance scripts for the clients, that is human >> readable special pages with reports on which pages lacks special >> treatment. In no particular order we need some way to identify >> unconnected pages in general (the present one does not work [1]), we >> need some way to identify pages that are unconnected but has some >> language links, we need to identify items that are used in some >> language and lacks labels (almost like [2],but on the client and for >> items that are somehow connected to pages on the client), and we need >> to identify items that lacks specific claims and the client pages use >> a specific template. >> >> There are probably more such maintenance pages, these are those that >> are most urgent. Now users start to create categories to hack around >> the missing maintenance pages, which create a bunch of categories.[3] >> At Norwegian Bokmål there are just a few scripts that utilize data >> from Wikidata, still the number of categories starts to grow large. >> >> For us at the "receiving end" this is a show stopper. We can't >> convince the users that this is a positive addition to the pages >> without the maintenance scripts, because them we more or less are in >> the blind when we try to fix errors. We can't use random pages to try >> to prod the pages to find something that is wrong, we must be able to >> search for the errors and fix them. >> >> This summer we (nowiki) have added about ten (10) properties to the >> infobokses, some with scripts and some with the property parser >> function. Most of my time I have not been coding, and I have not been >> fixing errors. I have been trying to explain to the community why >> Wikidata is a good idea. At one point the changes was even reverted >> because someone disagree with what we had done. The whole thing >> basically revolves around "my article got an Q-id in the infobox and I >> don't know how to fix it". We know how to fix it, and I have explained >> that to the editors at nowiki several times. They still don't get it, >> so we need some way to fix it, and we don't have maintenance scripts >> to do it. >> >> Right now we don't need more wild ideas that will swamp the >> development for months and years to come, we need maintenance scripts, >> and we need them now! >> >> [1] https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:UnconnectedPages >> [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntitiesWithoutLabel >> [3] >> https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:Prefiksindeks/Kategori:Artikler_hvor >> >> John Erling Blad >> /jeblad >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
