The next update (starting in 10 min or so) should add *all* Wikipedias. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:14 PM John Erling Blad <[email protected]> wrote:
> A couple of guys at nowiki has started using this tool, and if they > continue at present speed the list will be emptied in two weeks time. > > Can you please add nnwiki too and I will inform the community there > that there is a tool available. > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Magnus Manske > <[email protected]> wrote: > > John: List mode! > > > > > https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/duplicity.php?wiki=nowiki&mode=list > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:16 AM Zolo ... <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> About missing labels: in frwiki, most Wikidata data are added using > >> Module:Wikidata. The module adds a generic "to be translated" category > when > >> there is no French label. With Wikidata usage picking up speed, the > >> community is finally coming to grip with it, as can be seen from that > stats > >> at Catégorie:Page utilisant des données de Wikidata à traduire. > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:06 PM, John Erling Blad <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Nice solution, I'll post a link at Wikipedia:Torget. > >>> It is a bit like making a traffic statistic by using a road cam, so it > >>> wasn't really what I was looking for.. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Magnus Manske > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > I set up one of my tools for you (nowiki) for [1] : > >>> > https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/duplicity.php > >>> > > >>> > It doesn't give you a list (though I could add that), rather presents > >>> > you > >>> > with a random one and tries to find a matching item. Basically, what > >>> > you > >>> > need to do anyway for due diligence. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Not quite sure what else you need, too much "somehow" in your > >>> > description... > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM John Erling Blad <[email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> We lack several maintenance scripts for the clients, that is human > >>> >> readable special pages with reports on which pages lacks special > >>> >> treatment. In no particular order we need some way to identify > >>> >> unconnected pages in general (the present one does not work [1]), we > >>> >> need some way to identify pages that are unconnected but has some > >>> >> language links, we need to identify items that are used in some > >>> >> language and lacks labels (almost like [2],but on the client and for > >>> >> items that are somehow connected to pages on the client), and we > need > >>> >> to identify items that lacks specific claims and the client pages > use > >>> >> a specific template. > >>> >> > >>> >> There are probably more such maintenance pages, these are those that > >>> >> are most urgent. Now users start to create categories to hack around > >>> >> the missing maintenance pages, which create a bunch of > categories.[3] > >>> >> At Norwegian Bokmål there are just a few scripts that utilize data > >>> >> from Wikidata, still the number of categories starts to grow large. > >>> >> > >>> >> For us at the "receiving end" this is a show stopper. We can't > >>> >> convince the users that this is a positive addition to the pages > >>> >> without the maintenance scripts, because them we more or less are in > >>> >> the blind when we try to fix errors. We can't use random pages to > try > >>> >> to prod the pages to find something that is wrong, we must be able > to > >>> >> search for the errors and fix them. > >>> >> > >>> >> This summer we (nowiki) have added about ten (10) properties to the > >>> >> infobokses, some with scripts and some with the property parser > >>> >> function. Most of my time I have not been coding, and I have not > been > >>> >> fixing errors. I have been trying to explain to the community why > >>> >> Wikidata is a good idea. At one point the changes was even reverted > >>> >> because someone disagree with what we had done. The whole thing > >>> >> basically revolves around "my article got an Q-id in the infobox > and I > >>> >> don't know how to fix it". We know how to fix it, and I have > explained > >>> >> that to the editors at nowiki several times. They still don't get > it, > >>> >> so we need some way to fix it, and we don't have maintenance scripts > >>> >> to do it. > >>> >> > >>> >> Right now we don't need more wild ideas that will swamp the > >>> >> development for months and years to come, we need maintenance > scripts, > >>> >> and we need them now! > >>> >> > >>> >> [1] https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:UnconnectedPages > >>> >> [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntitiesWithoutLabel > >>> >> [3] > >>> >> > >>> >> > https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:Prefiksindeks/Kategori:Artikler_hvor > >>> >> > >>> >> John Erling Blad > >>> >> /jeblad > >>> >> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>> >> Wikidata mailing list > >>> >> [email protected] > >>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Wikidata mailing list > >>> > [email protected] > >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >>> > > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Wikidata mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikidata mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikidata mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
