You are not answering the question (not the first time). P27 has a lot of problems, due to people using it for citizenship and nationality at the same time. Put this in combination with the "fantastic" Wikipedia category system! AFAIK there is still some discussion going on here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Nationality <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Nationality>
You can fix some items manually, but a good discussion and reform about how we structure this kind of information is needed. Greetings, Sjoerd de Bruin [email protected] > Op 5 nov. 2017, om 12:04 heeft Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > Hoi, > There is much more to this. When a publication has been denounced, when the > author is denounced for having it ghost written. When ghost written is not to > reflect because of the stigma involved.. We should forcefully flag > publications, findings and authors when there is a problem.. A query should > not include what they publiced what hey "found". > > At this moment Wikidata is very much a stamp collection and we should be more > than that. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 5 November 2017 at 11:40, Marco Neumann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > What's the current procedure for disputing a non trivial claim on a > wikidata item? > > I know I can just go ahead and change a claim (statement and/or its > value) but the dispute itself would only be captured in the change-log > of the respective wikidata instance. > > Would one create a discussion entry on the item page first to motivate > a change on an item that's not straight forward? > > so for example on the item > > Paul Staines > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16191299 > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16191299> > > it states that person has > > :country of citizenship :United Kingdom > (a claim created by Rpfb119 on 1 April 2015 ) > > but on wikipedia-en it says nationality Irish without a reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Staines > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Staines> > > is there or should there be a qualifier/reference to flag a statement > to be in dispute? > > Also is this mailing-list the best place to discuss such (item > specific) matters? Or is the Wikidata community portal with the > Requests for comment service a better place? > > > thx > Marco > > > -- > > > --- > Marco Neumann > KONA > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
