In this case it was fairly easy to find some suitable sources, so I've updated the claim, and added references. As the original claim was unsourced, I think it's fine to simply replace it, rather than marking it as deprecated.
Tony On 5 November 2017 at 18:39, Nicolas VIGNERON <[email protected]> wrote: > 2017-11-05 19:13 GMT+01:00 Marco Neumann <[email protected]>: >> >> Andrew, >> >> what would be your first choice for conflict resolution here? write an >> entry into the relevant item/discuss page? or go for a Requests for >> comment on the Community portal? or to contact the claim author >> directly? > > > Hi, > > For resolving this specific case, I'd go on the talk page of the item > https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Q16191299 and notify the > people concerned (in this case, the wikidatian that added the claim but, > ideally, also the main contributors of the Wikipedia article, « with enough > eyeballs »). Especially in this case where the bottom of the issue seems to > be the lack of sources. > > Community pages are more for broad question or if previous discussions > failed to come to a consensus. > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
