Na, I am quite open, albeit impulsive. The information given was quite
good and some of my concerns regarding the involvement of Google were
also lifted or relativized. Mainly due to the fact that there seems to
be a sense of awareness.
I am just studying economic principles, which are very powerful. I also
have the feeling that free and open stuff just got a lot more commercial
and I am still struggling with myself whether this is good or not. Also
whether DBpedia should become frenemies with BigTech. Or funny things
like many funding agencies try to push for national sustainability
options, but most of the time, they suggest to use the GitHub Platform.
Wikibase could be an option here.
I have to apologize for the Knowledge Graph Talk thing. I was a bit
grumpy, because I thought I wasted a lot of time on the Talk page that
could have been invested in making the article better (WP:BE_BOLD
style), but now I think, it might have been my own mistake. So apologies
for lashing out there.
(see comments below)
On 20.09.19 17:53, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
Sebastian,
"I don't want to facilitate conspiracy theories, but ..."
"[I am] interested in what is the truth behind the truth"
I am sorry, I truly am, but this *is* the language I know from
conspiracy theorists. And given that, I cannot imagine that there is
anything I can say that could convince you otherwise. Therefore there
is no real point for me in engaging with this conversation on these
terms, I cannot see how it would turn constructive.
The answers to many of your questions are public and on the record.
Others tried to point you to them (thanks), but you dismiss them as
not fitting your narrative.
So here's a suggestion, which I think might be much more constructive
and forward-looking:
I have been working on a comparison of DBpedia, Wikidata, and Freebase
(and since you've read my thesis, you know that's a thing I know a bit
about). Simple evaluation, coverage, correctness, nothing dramatically
fancy. But I am torn about publishing it, because, d'oh, people may
(with good reasons) dismiss it as being biased. And truth be told -
the simple fact that I don't know DBpedia as well as I know Wikidata
and Freebase might indeed have lead to errors, mistakes, and stuff I
missed in the evaluation. But you know what would help?
You.
My suggestion is that I publish my current draft, and then you and me
work together on it, publically, in the open, until we reach a state
we both consider correct enough for publication.
What do you think?
Sure, we are doing statistics at the moment as well. It is a bit hard to
define what DBpedia is nowadays as we are rebranding the remixed
datasets, now that we can pick up links and other data from the Databus.
It might not even be a real dataset anymore, but glue between datasets
focusing on the speed of integration and ease of quality improvement.
Also still working on the concrete Sync Targets for GlobalFactSync
(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/DBpedia/GlobalFactSyncRE)
as well.
One question I have is whether Wikidata is effective/efficient or where
it is effective and where it could use improvement as a chance for
collaboration.
So yes any time.
-- Sebastian
Cheers,
Denny
P.S.: I am travelling the next week, so I may ask for patience
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:11 AM Thad Guidry <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thank you for sharing your opinions, Sebastian.
Cheers,
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:43 AM Sebastian Hellmann
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Thad,
On 20.09.19 15:28, Thad Guidry wrote:
With my tech evangelist hat on...
Google's philanthropy is nearly boundless when it comes to
the promotion of knowledge. Why? Because indeed it's in
their best interest otherwise no one can prosper without
knowledge. They aggregate knowledge for the benefit of
mankind, and then make a profit through advertising ... all
while making that knowledge extremely easy to be found for
the world.
I am neither pro-Google or anti-Google per se. Maybe skeptical
and interested in what is the truth behind the truth. Google
is not synonym to philanthropy. Wikimedia is or at least I
think they are doing many things right. Google is a platform,
so primarily they "aggregate knowledge for their benefit"
while creating enough incentives in form of accessibility for
users to add the user's knowledge to theirs. It is not about
what Google offers, but what it takes in return. 20% of
employees time is also an investment in the skill of the
employee, a Google asset called Human Capital and also leads
to me and Denny from Google discussing whether
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Knowledge_Graph is content
marketing or knowledge (@Denny: no offense, legit arguments,
but no agenda to resolve the stalled discussion there). Except
I don't have 20% time to straighten the view into what I
believe would be neutral, so pushing it becomes a resource issue.
I found the other replies much more realistic and the
perspective is yet unclear. Maybe Mozilla wasn't so much
frenemy with Google and got removed from the browser market
for it. I am also thinking about Linked Open Data.
Decentralisation is quite weak, individually. I guess
spreading all the Wikibases around to super-nodes is helpful
unless it prevents the formation of a stronger lobby of
philanthropists or competition to BigTech. Wikidata created
some pressure on DBpedia as well (also opportunities), but we
are fine since we can simply innovate. Others might not
withstand. Microsoft seems to favor OpenStreetMaps so I am
just asking to which degree Open Source and Open Data is being
instrumentalised by BigTech.
Hence my question, whether it is compromise or be removed.
(Note that states are also platforms, which measure value in
GDP and make laws and roads and take VAT on transactions.
Sometimes, they even don't remove opposition.)
--
All the best,
Sebastian Hellmann
Director of Knowledge Integration and Linked Data Technologies
(KILT) Competence Center
at the Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) at Leipzig
University
Executive Director of the DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org,
http://linguistics.okfn.org,
https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt
<http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt>
Homepage: http://aksw.org/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
--
All the best,
Sebastian Hellmann
Director of Knowledge Integration and Linked Data Technologies (KILT)
Competence Center
at the Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) at Leipzig University
Executive Director of the DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org,
http://linguistics.okfn.org, https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt
<http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt>
Homepage: http://aksw.org/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
