Agree that anything you do should have an easy opt in opt out option

Don't forget RSS either - most blogs generate RSS (a list of recent
submissions) anyway and this can form the basis of a newsletter too. Google
homepage, many email readers today all support RSS subscription.

The real difference between the blog and newsletter in terms of content is
that usually a blog is collaborative, self building, and up to date whereas
a Newsletter is usually composed by somebody and thus requires greater
effort (someone collates all the info and sends it out) and has some time
lag . However, Newsletter's can be targeted better, as marketing tool and
direct to people but that in-its-self is a double edge sword, as you have to
maintain your audience.

I suspect for the first couple of communications you want a targeted
newsletter. As you catch up with the information you want to deliver then
moving to a more automated communication, RSS and possibly email
subscription would be the way. I would say go straight to the blog and
automated option.

For offline people, this changes. The advantage of an up to the minute
automated information service such a blog will never be met. For these
people an offline version of a newsletter is required. However, even an
offline newsletter can be generated from online content though some
automated process - the creation of the content may not be the issue - but
how they receive it could (which impacts frequency). As well as traditional
post, you can also deliver a newsletter as an Acrobat file which can be
downloaded and printed (in 100000's if neeed) in the destination country,
they could even do this from a web page. So the web can still be used to
facilitate offline users.

Ray






-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Steve Foerster
Sent: 07 November 2009 15:45
To: WikiEducator
Subject: [WikiEducator] Re: WE blog or newsletter?


Wayne wrote:

<< Agree we need to be very careful with mass-email which can arguably
and justifiably be labelled as WE  spam. I would suggest implementing
an option for new users to subscribe to a news / letter magazine.  We
can consider a once off notification to WE account holders regarding
the option to subscribe to the news letter once this option has been
implemented for new account holders. However -- this would need to be
an affirmative action to subscribe rather than a default that everyone
gets the newsletter unless they opt out. >>

Good, that's a reasonable approach.


<< Personally, I'd like to see both -- they serve different audiences
and I don't see one replacing and / or duplicating the other.
 WikiEducator has extensive reach in the developing world -- places
where connectivity is difficult, unreliable and expensive. The
newsletter / WE magazine is an innovative way to "connect" the
"disconnected" and keep those who want to stay abreast of what is
happening online.  Notifying teachers around the world of exemplary
resources that may be of use. Profiling and sharing experiences of the
efforts in setting up national OER collaborations (eg Uganda,
 Bangladesh, India etc.)  --- These experiences are invaluable for
other countries trying to bootstrap OER.  We could have a low-
resolution version to simplify local reproduction and keep costs to a
minimum. Certainly, within the formal education sector -- there are
still large numbers of educators who do not surf the blog sphere ---
lets cast a wide net for open education :-) >>

Very well, but there's no reason that a blog and a dead-trees
newsletter couldn't have the same content.  We could have the official
news blog, and when there have been enough posts to fill however many
pages we want the newsletter to be, we release the same content as
PDF, RTF, ODT, etc.  (Our actually printing and posting it sounds
expensive, I assume that's not the intent here?)

One potential issue with treeware is that some countries use Letter
size and some use A4.  (My wife's doing an LLB through a school in the
UK from here in the U.S. where A4 is annoyingly hard to find, so we've
been hit in the head by this one.)


<< Hopefully there will be more people than Wayne, Jim posting -- we
should also include posts from Council members, workgroup leaders,
featured teachers etc.  This model would need some sort of editorial
team to oversee alignment with community values etc. >>

Valerie edited the workgroup charter to have us continue to oversee
whatever blogs come out of this process.  That's okay with me, at
least as a starting point.


<< We definitely need an outlet that isn't edited --- we just need a
clear communication / disclaimer  that the posts are the opinions of
the individuals writing them. >>

Very good, so then it seems our workgroup should refine the approach
of having three blogs:

1. Terra Incognita if possible, or if not then a sort of "Nova Terra
Incognita".

2. An official newsletter blog, the contents of which are also
periodically released in paper format.

3. An open blog where WikiEducators can easily add posts and there's
light-handed moderation.

-=Steve=-


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to