Wayne,

 

Thanks for sharing these concerns as well as your own reflections. I'm in
agreement with your four personal points and would support including the
google search capability. After all, many of us use closed software and
company branded hardware to produce OER and we use googlegroups for having
these discussions. If there is a need to explain our position on these
matters to the user community, the rationale for the decision to make use of
such capabilities as google search could be posted somewhere on the sitre.

 

Jan

 

--

Jan Visser, Ph.D.

President & Sr. Researcher, Learning Development Institute

E-mail: [email protected] 

Check out: http://www.learndev.org and http://www.facebook.com/learndev

Blog: http://jvisser-ldi.blogspot.com/

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Wayne Mackintosh
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:20 AM
To: WikiEducator; [email protected]
Subject: [WikiEducator] Improving our our search capability -- WE need your
advice

 

Hi Everyone,

Apology for the long post -- but this is potentially an important policy
decision for the WikiEducator community. Since our inception, both
WikiEducator and the OER Foundation have subscribed to open philanthropy --
where we discuss and take decisions transparently and collaboratively :-). 

We are thinking about improving our search capability by enabling the Google
Custom Search box on the WikiEducator site. At that same time we need to
think carefully about the conditions and possible policy implications for
WikiEducator.

Today we've had a few discussions on our techie list on with reference to
improving our search features in WIkiEducator (See:
http://groups.google.co.nz/group/wikieducator-tech/browse_frm/thread/e33d256
7a6cda18b). Clearly the ability to search and find open content resources in
WIkiEducator is a priority for educators, and will increasingly become more
important as our project evolves.

The current Mediawiki search capability is not the best search technology in
the world.  (To be fair to -- "searching" is not the core business of wiki
developers.) IMHO, there is still no other open source wiki software which
remotely compares to the scalability and power of the Mediawiki software
engine and WE are proud to be a Mediawiki site :-). 

Technically it is relatively easy for us to implement the Google Custom
Search Service on WikiEducator.  In short, this will mean we can utilise
Google search technology for the WIkiEducator site by inserting a Google
search box for using Google technology for searching the WikiEducator
website. This provides superior web search results when compared to our
current Mediawiki search capability.  However, enabling the Google Custom
Search on WikiEducator may require a policy decision with reference to using
these kinds of ancillary webservices. WE need your advice and guidance.  

The substantive issue here is using a web service on the WIkiEducator site
which does not meet the requirements of the free cultural works definition
for an ancillary activity of the WikiEducator project, Our core business is
the creation, remix and reuse of OER which must always meet the requirements
of the free cultural works definition. This is non-negotiable and a core
value of our community. 

A few reflections: 

Speaking personally,  I'm keen for us to seriously consider using the Google
Custom Search under clearly defined paramaters - I think this will add value
to WikIEducator without compromising our core values.  So here are the
questions to think about:

1.      Should we provide a Google Custom Search box on the WikiEducator
site for using Google search technology on the WIkiEducator site? Yes/No?
2.      Is the community comfortable with Google's terms of service most
notably the closed ownership of the search results and the use of closed
software to produce the search results? (Personally, I'm OK with this on the
grounds that search results are not core content of the WE project --- our
OERs must always comply with the free cultural works definition). See
Google's terms of service: http://www.google.com/cse/docs/tos.html .
3.      Regarding advertising -- our practice is not to permit advertising
on the WikiEducator site. So I'm pleased to see that Google will allow
registered non-profits advert free results. In the event that Google's
policy changes in this regard, we would need to reconsider the use of Google
Custom search and discontinue the service if we are forced to display text
adverts with the search results.
4.      With reference to our thoughts on advertising - -we are required to
use the Google branded search box. I think this is     justifiable and not
necessarily an "advert" for Google. For example, the Mozilla Foundation
allow the brand identities of the searchproviders to be displayed in their
software. 

Please let us know your thoughts on these issues. In the event that we
decide to go with the Google Custom Search facility -- I propose that we
table a policy decision for the WIkiEducator Council with regards to
non-core services which may not meet all the requirements of the free
cultural works definition.

Cheers
Wayne

-- 
Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
Director,
International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org 
Mobile +64 21 2436 380
User Page: http://wikieducator.org/User:Mackiwg
Skype: WGMNZ1
Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to