Hi Joyce,

The OER Foundation will certainly be working with tertiary education
institutions in transforming reward and incentive mechanisms for OER course
development. In other words -- recognising OER course development at part of
their work. The international exposure and networking through projects like
WikiEducator is considerable and a value-added benefit in participating.

Already institutions make a considerable investment in course development
under the traditional model. By releasing courses under free content
licenses -- organisations don't loose anything, but have the potential to
save time and cost by sharing existing OERs.

So lets work together in making these futures happen!

Cheers
Wayne

On 3 July 2010 18:41, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that the effort to get institutions to allocate time and resources
> to OER development is an excellent idea.   In addition, I hope you will work
> with them to put OER course and materials development into the criteria they
> use for promotion and tenure.   I think that many university faculty members
> are reluctant to invest too much time in outside course development because
> it does not "count" toward retaining and succeeding in our jobs.  While many
> people who are piecing together a variety of jobs would probably appreciate
> the money, others who have full time work would probably appreciate having
> their volunteer efforts recognized by their institutions.  I know I would.
> J.
>
> [email protected] wrote: -----
>
> To: [email protected]
> From: Wayne Mackintosh
> Sent by: [email protected]
> Date: 07/02/2010 10:41PM
>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Resource Repository
>
> Hi Cynthia, Joyce, Alison and Mallabibro
>
> All very good suggestions -- WE must get better at indexing, categorising
> and labelling the degrees of completeness of our OER assets . In part --
> this is a problem of our exponential growth in that our capacity to respond
> meaningfully to these needs has not kept pace with our growth. In some
> respects, this is a good problem to have :-).
>
> *Thinking strategically*
>
> Apology for the long response --- but this is an important issue for both
> WikiEducator and the OER Foundation. I'd like to share some of our strategic
> thinking.
>
> WikiEducator uses an apprenticeship model in that users can improve their
> competencies across a wide range of relevant areas  (eg learning design,
> technology, visual design, intellectual property issues etc.) Since our
> inception WE've made a commitment to help and support all educators,
> irrespective of their levels of expertise and prefer not to exercise value
> judgements in the quality of content unless the user specially opts into a
> quality review process. I think that investing in people through community
> development will achieve sustainable results for the future.
>
> WE have two immediate challenges:
>
>
>    1. *The complexity and inertia required to develop high quality
>    learning materials*, when compared, for instance to an encyclopedia
>    article. The effort required to author an open textbook is considerably 
> more
>    than collaborating on an article on Apples. Many contributors start with
>    excitement to develop a new course or textbook only to loose energy and
>    impetus. As a result we have a number of incomplete projects. Not all bad 
> --
>    at least there is a starting point for future contributors.
>    2. *Technology solutions geared to the needs of educators. *(This
>    refers to the usability of our technologies but also the  requirements*
>    *which are unique to formal educational contexts.) * *The Mediawiki
>    software engine is very powerful and it is possible to find a number of
>    workaround  solutions to many of these challenges, for example tweaking the
>    extensive range of Mediawiki extensions that are available to address these
>    needs. The downside is that many of these fixes require a level of 
> technical
>    competence for the user above the levels of the average wiki Newbie.
>
> *What are we doing to address these needs? *
>
> The OER Foundation is committed to finding solutions to these challenges.
> Strategically, I think we need to focus on two priorities:
>
>
>    1. *Increasing our capacity to compete the development of high quality
>    OERs*, designed for maximum reuse potential (both in terms of pedagogy
>    and delivery technology (e.g. using the same OER resources for print, 
> online
>    etc.). There are two things we can do to increase our capacity -- a) extend
>    our training opportunities to advance the skills of Wikieducators around 
> the
>    world to develop high quality materials and b) Increase the available time
>    educators can spend on developing OER. In this regard, the OER Foundation
>    has a two pronged strategy. First we will focus on raising sufficient
>    financial resources to compensate authors for completing high priority
>    content needs by paying for their time. Second, through our institutional
>    membership models we encourage and reward institutions for allocating staff
>    time to OER development as part of their jobs. So for example, you will see
>    that our Gold level membership is cheaper than our Silver level membership
>    because gold members allocate staff time to OER development. (
>    http://wikieducator.org/OERF:Join). Our FTE4WikiEducator membership
>    category is also designed to increase the available time for OER 
> development
>    and reuse.
>    2. *Smart technology solutions*. WE also need to invest time and money
>    into the software refinements which will enable us to achieve our
>    objectives. Our fund raising strategies and membership models will succeed
>    in helping us to improve our technologies. The OER Foundation is not wedded
>    to any specific technology --- if its open source and it will help us
>    achieve the vision of free education resources for all students of the 
> world
>    -- then we implement a tapestry of appropriate technical solutions to
>    support our work.
>
> We are very serious about getting OER right and have spent considerable
> time and effort in getting the organisational foundations and infrastructure
> right to achieve these objectives. The OER Foundation will be publishing its
> inaugural annual report in the near future and you will see that we have a
> very sold base to provide leadership, international networking and support
> for educators and educational institutions to achieve their objectives
> through OER :-).
>
> Exciting times!
>
> Cheers
> Wayne
>
>
>
> On 3 July 2010 10:36, MALLAMIBRO <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'd suggest an index be created of works on WE, classified by therir
>> levels of  completeness.
>> Members interested in editing or in adding to such works could then
>> have an easier way of finding them.
>> It could be a good idea to introduce a "join a project" section to the
>> L4C workshops where every participant will be expected to join in
>> working on one of the projects requiring cleanups or additions.
>> Ibrahim K. Oyekanmi
>>
>> On 7/2/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I am not sure I am talking about a top down approach.  My model would
>> > emphasize initial author control (at least at first).  The primary
>> author
>> > would determine when to submit a piece for wide distribution, the
>> process
>> > you are suggesting could then be implemented, and these edited resources
>> > could be presented in an easily searchable format.  The broad
>> wikieducator
>> > could still be made accessible for those with the time and inclination
>> to
>> > mine it but such a preliminary screening/editing process would be
>> helpful to
>> > many people for whom time is an extremely valuable commodity.  J.
>> >
>> > [email protected] wrote: -----
>> >>
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> From: Alison Snieckus
>> >> Sent by: [email protected]
>> >> Date: 07/02/2010 09:52AM
>> >> Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Resource Repository
>> >>
>> >> Hi Cynthia and Joyce,
>> >>
>> >> I also agree that it's difficult to find quality resources on
>> >> WikiEducator. But they are there! And as WE grow and expand in
>> membership,
>> >> these high quality resources are sure to as well.
>> >>
>> >> An effort was started awhile back, before I joined, to create a way to
>> >> identify, organize and feature quality WE resources. It's called the
>> >> Quality Assurance Framework.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think the program was ever implemented, at least in any major
>> way.
>> >> I'd be interested to be part of a group to get a QA framework (like the
>> >> one outlined) working on WE, maybe beginning with a limited pilot.
>> >>
>> >> Anyone else interested?
>> >> Alison
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I agree that there is too much to search through now so this sounds
>> like
>> >>> a good idea to me.  Give the authors the opportunity to put completed
>> >>> work somewhere that is easily accessible yet still editable by people
>> who
>> >>> want to adapt it to their own circumstances?   J.
>> >>>
>> >>> [email protected] wrote: -----
>> >>>>
>> >>>> To: WikiEducator <[email protected]>
>> >>>> From: Cynthia
>> >>>> Sent by: [email protected]
>> >>>> Date: 07/01/2010 10:32PM
>> >>>> Subject: [WikiEducator] Resource Repository
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dear friends,
>> >>>> There is so much on WE. Many contributions are fabulous. Sadly a good
>> >>>> number are incomplete or poorly done. Of course editing them is an
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> option. I wonder if we could have a WE library for completely done
>> >>>> good works to be featured? or is there such a repository? If one were
>> >>>> to look out for good and complete matter, he/she needn't sift through
>> >>>>
>> >>>> incomplete or mediocre work. Please guide as I am only a month old at
>> >>>>
>> >>>> WE.
>> >>>> User Name: Agnes
>> >>>> Cynthia D'Costa
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>>> Groups "WikiEducator" group.
>> >>>> To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
>> >>>> To visit the discussion forum:
>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>>> [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> Groups "WikiEducator" group.
>> >>> To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
>> >>> To visit the discussion forum:
>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups "WikiEducator" group.
>> >> To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
>> >> To visit the discussion forum:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected]
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "WikiEducator" group.
>> > To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
>> > To visit the discussion forum:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected]
>>
>>
>> --
>> MALLAMIBRO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY
>> P O BOX 13145
>> KANO G P O
>> KANO
>> NIGERIA TEL : +234-808-227-7575; +234-702-581-8401
>> http://www.mallamibro.webs.com
>>
>> http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Mallamibro
>>
>> email: [email protected]
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "WikiEducator" group.
>> To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
>> To visit the discussion forum:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
> Director,
> International Centre for Open Education,
> Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
> Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
> Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org
> Mobile +64 21 2436 380
> User Page: http://wikieducator.org/User:Mackiwg
> Skype: WGMNZ1
> Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "WikiEducator" group.
> To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
> To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "WikiEducator" group.
> To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
> To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
>



-- 
Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
Director,
International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org
Mobile +64 21 2436 380
User Page: http://wikieducator.org/User:Mackiwg
Skype: WGMNZ1
Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to