On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <[email protected]>wrote:
> I think in fact that the headline is misleading. This isn't really > a case of Britannica taking on Wikipedia. It is more like they > may have seen Veropedia in their rear view mirror, and gotten > scared. A peer reviewed study that unfavorably compared > Britannica with Veropedia in terms of timeliness, scope and > accuracy would be quite devastating to Britannica, since > Veropedia also vets its contents. Was that before or after Veropedia dropped off the face of the planet, the company that runs it was administratively dissolved by the state, and the founder was spotted begging Obama for government handouts? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
