Durova wrote: > Their main advantage in the current market is that their content is vetted. > Question is whether they can afford the staff to keep up with submissions, > and whether that value added is worth the price they charge for it. The > market seems to be saying no. And if they walk away from that strategy what > other working model is there? > Actually I don't know that the question is rhetorical. There is the hidden assumption: EB is the universal encyclopedia (for English-language readers). There must be ways of running a reference website for money that drop the comprehensiveness and timeliness (WP's major strengths) as the central ambitions.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
