On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> Like I say, this story itself may be an urban myth, and certainly
> even if it happened to be in fact true, it would reference a very
> early edition of Britannica, perhaps even one of the very first
> editions. I am sure even their editorial standards have not
> always been as high, as they are today.

If you're not trying to imply anything about Britannica's current accuracy,
and you're not even sure it's true, then I don't even get the point of
mentioning it.


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to